![]() The results are measured in Thousands of Samples per Second. The test model used is Sala with 488,000 triangles. LuxRender's LuxMark 2 benchmarks OpenCL effects render speed. ( HIGHER number means FASTER.)Īgain, the Mac mini beats the iMac because the mini's Quad-Core i7 supports hyperthreading. The overall rating combines the four tests. It is multi-threaded and multi-core aware. Geekbench 2.4 measures processor (integer and floating point speed) and memory (performance and bandwidth). The iMac's Quad-Core i5 does not so it only runs 4 threads. The slower clocked Mac mini beats the iMac because the mini's Quad-Core i7 supports hyperthreading it's running 8 threads. Rather than time in seconds, it gives a speed rating. Maxon's Cinebench 11.5 cross-platform benchmark uses code from Cinema 4D to stress all available cores of a CPU. ![]() 2012 MAC MINI QUAD CORE I7 PRORMBP 2.7 = 'mid 2012' (15") MacBook Pro 2.7GHz Quad-Core i7 with GeForce GT 650M GPU, 512GB factory flash drive, and 16GB of RAM Mini 2.6 = 'late 2012' Mac mini 2.6GHz Quad-Core i7 with Intel HD 4000 GPU, 1TB Fusion Drive, and 16GB of RAM IMac 2.9 = 'late 2012' (21.5") iMac 2.9GHz Quad-Core i5 with GeForce GT 650M GPU, 1TB HDD, and 8GB of RAM Plus you can easily run these tests on your own Mac for comparison. This page uses CPU and GPU intensive benchmark results as an appetizer until we can post some real world test results. We don't usually post on Saturdays but I know how anxious you are to see some hard data on the 'late 2012' iMac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |